★★★★★
Crossan
ponders, “I had observed that the parabolic stories by Jesus seemed
remarkably similar to the resurrection stories about Jesus. Were the
latter intended as parables just as much as the former? Had we been
reading parable, presuming history, and misunderstanding both?”
In
other words, are the stories of Jesus really book-length parables?
Crossan presents three such parables in the Old Testament: Job, Ruth and
Jonah. Ruth challenges a part of the Bible, Jonah challenges the whole
of the Bible, and Job challenges the God of the Bible. But isn’t there a
major difference between the Old Testament books and the Gospels? Were
the characters in these stories historical, the way we think of Jesus?
So Crossan presents the story of Caesar at the Rubicon as “parabolic
history” to show how even historical characters can be the subject of
the development of parables.
Crossan
separates parables by their flavor: riddle, example, challenge, and
attack parables. I found the discussion of several New Testament
parables insightful, but they served only as a lead-in to the bigger
topic. In part 2, Crossan takes on the four Gospels each as a whole,
presenting the meaning of them as book-length parables … what they
challenge, what they attack.
It
is not really the historicity of the Gospels that Crossan contests,
but their evangelical purpose. The undercurrent of truth, or lack
thereof, is not the focus of his book; it is the way the stories are
bent into parable, and what these book-length parables mean.
Thought-provoking and well-written, a great read.
No comments:
Post a Comment