And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
//I
write so often about “eschatology” that I often forget it’s a big,
confusing word that most people write off to the world of Bible
scholarship. In my upcoming book about John’s Gospel, I define
eschatology straightforwardly:
The doctrine of the last or final things, as death, judgment, and the events therewith connected.
But I actually prefer this practical definition by scholar N. T. Wright:
If
there is one god, and you are his one people, but you are currently
suffering oppression, you must believe that the present state of affairs
is temporary. Monotheism and election thus give birth to (what I call)
eschatology: the belief that history is going somewhere, that something
will happen through which everything will be put right.*
Our
Bible abounds in eschatological thinking. Simply turn to any passage
that deals with the suffering of the Jewish nation, Old Testament or
New, and you find there a promise of better things to come. Wright’s
observation is brilliant: eschatological thinking is the belief that
history is going somewhere.
Prophets,
apologists, and followers have expressed views for 3,000 years about
just where history is going, but nearly all agree that something will
happen to set things right. Maybe a New Jerusalem will float down from
heaven and replace the old (today’s verse in Revelation). Maybe the good
guys will float up to heaven and find a new city waiting there.
Or, maybe we’ll figure out that our future is in our own hands, and go
to work with what we have, to make it better.
Whatever
our beliefs about what is to come, there is a question that we must ask
ourselves. Are Christians called to participate in the inauguration of
the new age, what Jesus called the Kingdom of Heaven? Is Christianity an
active or a passive belief system?
Your choice.
*The Meaning of Jesus, c. 1999, p. 32
No comments:
Post a Comment