I know the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
//These words are written by John to the city of Smyrna, one of seven
cities to whom the book of Revelation is addressed. There are two ways
to interpret John’s frustration:
[1] There are Gentiles in Asia Minor who are masquerading as Jews.
[2] There are Jews up in Asia Minor who have forsaken their heritage, and are frolicking with Gentile beliefs.
Most
scholars lean toward [2], finding it unimaginable that John would deny
Christian fellowship to Gentiles. But I’m actually not so sure. I waffle
on the topic in my own book about Revelation. The fact is, Revelation
is a very Jewish book, repeating age-old dreams of redemption for the
Jewish nation. John never once uses the word “Christian”; he sees
himself as a Jew who acknowledges Jesus as the Jewish Messiah.
Regardless
of the way you interpret this verse, it becomes one of many in
Revelation that verify that Christianity and Judaism had not yet
separated. The intense schism between Jew and Christians revealed in
such books as John’s Gospel does not yet exist in Revelation. Yet,
Revelation and John’s Gospel share many common themes, though their
eschatology, cosmology, and vision of Jesus remain so different.
Clearly, one drew from the other, or both drew from a common religious
language.
How
is it possible, then, that scholars pretend both were written in the
90’s, in the same area of the world? Could they reflect two different
views by two different competing men, arguing over the meaning of Jesus?
I
find it far more likely that Revelation’s primitive cosmology precedes
John’s Gospel by a dozen years or more, and that John’s Gospel reflects a
“growing up,” discarding the vengeful, messianic dreams of Revelation.
It’s from this perspective that I write my two books, about Revelation and John’s Gospel.
No comments:
Post a Comment