Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." Jesus replied, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven.
//Today's verse comes from Matthew. But one of the more interesting
tendencies I noted as I researched for my book about John's Gospel is
just how often John purposefully contradicts the other Gospels. Many of
the contradictions, in fact, tend to downplay something miraculous, such
as this divine revelation to Simon Peter. There seems to be an
undercurrent of rivalry going on with Peter in the Fourth Gospel. Here,
John pooh-pooh's Matthew's explanation and sets the record straight
about how Simon Peter learned who Jesus was:
The first thing Andrew did was to find his brother Simon and tell him, "We have found the Messiah" (that is, the Christ). --John 1:41
But this begs the question. Could it have been explained to Peter and also
come as a revelation to him? In other words, does "revelation" mean
something more along the lines of proving the truth about Jesus for
yourself? "Revelation," then, is not some means of divine discloser of a
secret but rather making a known truth your own. Does this resonate
with anyone else?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteInteresting. Thanks.
ReplyDelete